Few solar photovoltaic sectors exhibit as volatile a
combination of hype and promise as the copper indium gallium
(di)selenide (CIGS) thin-film segment. A handful of companies--Global
Solar, Wurth, Showa Shell, for example---are already manufacturing
relatively modest amounts of commercial products using CIGS (or its
cousin, CIS) films on glass, stainless steel, or flexible substrates,
while a larger number are just developing (or trying to develop)
processes, building and characterizing (or trying to build and
characterize) pilot or initial manufacturing lines, or talking (and
talking) about building volume-manufacturing facilities.
CIGS companies are a mix of public and private,
venture-funded start-ups and units of large corporations, relative
newbies and long-time veterans. Process technologies employed by the
CIGS crowd, many of which have been in R&D for decades, range from
vacuum to nonvacuum, evaporation/coevaporation to sputtering, ink-print
to selenization, electrochemical to RTP diffusion techniques---or
combinations thereof. Some use rigid substrates, others prefer flex,
some employ batch process techniques, while others take a roll-to-roll
or web approach. Module integration strategies include both discrete
and monolithic approaches.
The CIGS players tout common
themes on the advantages of modules made with their material: The
thin-film cocktail has the most conversion-efficiency upside of any
non-crystalline silicon PV material (up to the high teens, though
current device efficiencies are in the low double-digits and module
efficiencies a few percentage points below that). The toolsets are/will
be cheaper and more efficient, and the process promotes better
utilization of the critical materials, especially compared to c-Si
technologies. CIGS provides the best opportunity for facilitating true
building-integrated PV, which will be a huge market some day, and also
will be very competitive for large, utility-scale solar farms and
personal/portable apps. Most importantly, the delivered cost per watt
of CIGS modules produced on fully characterized, volume CIGS lines will
run less than a dollar--maybe even way less---thereby achieving the
ultimate goal of grid parity with the existing carbon-generating power
sources.
In recent months many CIGS outfits have made a
series of PR and VC moves, while others have been quiet, even downright
stealthy, or at least less prone to tooting their own horn.
Honda Soltec
created a bit of noise in mid-November when it opened its Kumamoto
production plant, which it says will have a 27.5 MW capacity when fully
ramped later this year. A week later,
Solibro Solar,
a spinoff from Angstrom Solar in Sweden and majority controlled by
number-two solar-cell maker Q-Cells, said its first factory (25-30 MWp
capacity) is under construction in Thalheim, Germany, and will come
online in the second half of 2008.
Global Solar
announced in early 2007 that its second CIGS plant (30 MW) would open
near Berlin in the latter half of this year, in addition to an
expansion--from 4 to 40 MW---of its core Tucson fab. Showa Shell said
last summer that it plans to add a 60-MW plant next to its current
20-MW CIS line in Miyazaki.
(Before continuing, a reality
check: Even with the additional CIGS manufacturing capacity
slated/alleged to be coming online this year and next, thin-film PV
leader First Solar can already produce more than the equivalent amount
of all near-term existing and projected CIGS megawattage on its cadmium
telluride-on-glass production lines, and will vastly exceed the total
worldwide CIGS capacity once its Malaysian factories start coming up to
speed.)
Now back to CIGS.... Venture darlings
Nanosolar and
HelioVolt,
no strangers to the media and investment community hype game, each
sharpened their hand-waving skills in December. Nanosolar shipped the
"world’s first printed thin-film solar cell in a commercial panel
product" (and earned its first revenues) from its "fourth-generation"
roll-to-roll line in San Jose. It also offered details of a 1-MW solar
power plant in eastern Germany, to be integrated by Beck Energy, that
will use the company's panels. Many skeptics wonder how quickly (if
ever) the company will ramp its production fab to its purported 430-MW
ultimate capacity (which would place Nanosolar among the upper tier of
solar manufacturers, at least in terms of production capabilities). But
at least the magic words "shipped product" and "sales revenues" now
appear on Nanosolar's corporate resume.
As for HelioVolt, the
company said it will use much of the record $101 million that it raised
in Series B funding to start building and equipping its first plant
near Austin, which will sport an initial production capacity of 20 MW,
with first commercial products shipping by year's end. The company also
signed up leading MES supplier
Eyelit
as its manufacturing software infrastructure provider, which bodes well
for HelioVolt's ability to ramp its production quickly and
effectively---as long as the company can dial its process in and scale
it to volume.
In contrast to the more publicity-generating companies,
Solyndra
continues to operate in deep-stealth mode; its Website, little more
than a help-wanted board, remains devoid of substantive information.
Does the company really exist? How many people are working there? Who
are the executives? What kind of CIGS process does it use? When will
its fab be up and running and shipping product? Who are its customers?
How is the company spending those tens of millions of venture
investment funds? Even though being privately held means that Solyndra
has no obligation to tell me or any other media or market types
anything, I'd love to talk to the execs there, because this stealth
stuff has become really stale, and they need to tell their story and
let people know what they're up to!
Although not strictly stealthy,
SoloPower
has been in silent running of late, with company CEO Houmayoun Talieh
refusing interview requests from Chip Shots and other press outlets.
The company did show up in the business press in early November, when
the
San Jose Business Journal reported
that SoloPower will be moving its R&D and manufacturing operations
from Milpitas to San Jose, thanks to cash and other incentives from the
San Jose Redevelopment Agency. The move raises questions about whether
the company will achieve its stated goal of having its 20-MW plant
operational and producing commercial product by 3Q08. But that question
(and others) will remain unanswered until Houmayoun or other company
honchos decide to 'fess up.
The fortunes of one-time sector darling
Miasole came under scrutiny in late December, when the blogosphere helped break the story of
layoffs of 40 employees at the Fremont, CA-based company as
well as the departure of founder and former chairman, David Pearce.
Both actions, as well as continued slippage in their production
schedule, elicit concern about the dodginess of the company's
sputter-based, roll-to-roll CIGS processing and its ultimate commercial
viability.
Making CIGS on foil in the R&D lab is one
thing, but consistently producing devices on a production line, with
high yields and competitive conversion efficiencies, is another, as
Miasole has found out.
DayStar Technologies,
which like Miasole uses a sputter deposition process, has also
discovered that production scaling of CIGS on foil is quite difficult.
The materials don't always cooperate when it comes to
compositional control and uniformity.
The publicly traded company announced last spring that it had switched
from foil to glass modules for its initial product line (although it
continues to work on developing the flexible steel). Still sticking to
its "we're building out our 25-MW production line" story, DayStar has
offered few specifics of its manufacturing plans.
Later this
week in Chip Shots, I will blog about a couple of CIGS purveyors that
have taken a lower-key, less hyperbolic approach than some of their
peers, but deserve to be a part of any substantive discussion on the
current and future propects of thin-film PV : Ascent Solar and
International Solar Electric Technology (ISET).