Japan independent commission deems Fukushima a “profoundly man-made disaster”

  • The report stated:
    The report stated: "The voices and thoughts of evacuated residents who do not have other places to turn to were very clear.”
  • "The earthquake and tsunami of March 11, 2011 were natural disasters of a magnitude that shocked the entire world," said the report.
  •   Map showing the radius of the nuclear disaster at Fukushima.
    Map showing the radius of the nuclear disaster at Fukushima.
  • The report asks the government “to learn from this disaster and reflect deeply on its fundamental causes, in order to ensure that it is never repeated.”
    The report asks the government “to learn from this disaster and reflect deeply on its fundamental causes, in order to ensure that it is never repeated.”
  • Chairman of the commitee Kiyoshi Kurokawa: “Its fundamental causes are to be found in the ingrained conventions of Japanese culture
    Chairman of the commitee Kiyoshi Kurokawa: “Its fundamental causes are to be found in the ingrained conventions of Japanese culture".

Independent commission, the Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission (NAIIC), presented its findings to the National Diet of Japan. The report concluded that the agencies and governmental departments involved were aware of the risk from both the earthquake and tsunami of March last year, making the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant a “profoundly man-made disaster”.

The report scathingly points a finger at the operator of the plant, Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO), energy regulators NISA and NSC and the government body METI, cataloguing a “multitude of errors and wilful negligence that left the Fukushima plant unprepared for the events of March 11, 2011.” The commission terms this a “Made in Japan” disaster: “Its fundamental causes are to be found in the ingrained conventions of Japanese culture: our reflexive obedience; our reluctance to question authority; our devotion to ‘sticking with the program’; our groupism; and our insularity.”

However, the report also notes that it is important to not lay blame on any particular organization, but “to learn from this disaster and reflect deeply on its fundamental causes, in order to ensure that it is never repeated.”

In conclusion, the report states that all the authorities concerned “failed to correctly develop the most basic safety requirements - such as assessing the probability of damage, preparing for containing collateral damage from such a disaster and developing evacuation plans for the public in the case of a serious radiation release.”

The NAAIC, formed on October 30, 2011, was the first independent commission created in the history of Japan’s constitutional government. The investigation covered more than 900 hours of hearings and interviews with 1,167 people. The team made nine site visits to nuclear power plants including Fukushima Daiichi, Fukushima Daini, Tohoku Electric Power Company Onagawa Nuclear Power Plant and The Japan Atomic Power Company Tokai Daini Power Plant. The study does not cover matters related to the future energy policies of Japan, including the promotion or abolition of nuclear power.

Notwithstanding, last week, Japan published its renewable energy road map, which curiously included the country’s plans to commission 14 nuclear plants by 2030 whilst concurrently expanding its feed-in tariff systems for renewables as well as increasing support for R & D projects and local revitalization.

This brutal report is drawn to a close with witness statements: “From the perspectives of the evacuees, ad-hoc instructions caused many people to evacuate multiple times, in some cases to areas with high radiation doses, and/or with only barest necessities. The voices and thoughts of evacuated residents who do not have other places to turn to were very clear.”
 

Newsletter

Preview Latest
Subscribe
We won't share your details - promise!

Publications

  • Photovoltaics International 19th Edition

    For manufacturers who had their heads in the bunker during 2012, fighting falling ASPs and eroding margins, the nineteenth edition brings you details of what lies in store for this coming year. Wright Williams & Kelly return in this issue with their popular analysis of payback on technology buys; crucially they analyze n-type wafers, Al2O3 passivation and copper metallization. SERIS shows us how to achieve 18.7% efficiencies using low-cost etching techniques on diffused wafers. We also have two important technology roundups: CIGS from Helmholtz Berlin, and PV module encapsulation techniques from Fraunhofer ISE.

  • Manufacturing The Solar Future: The 2013 Production Annual

    In the ever-changing global solar markets, cost reduction and measures to increase cell efficiencies are the key tools available to PV manufacturers to create new opportunities and drive your business to the next level. Manufacturing the Solar Future 2013 is the third in the Photovoltaics International PV Production Annual series, delivering the next instalment of in-depth technical manufacturing information on PV production processes designed to help you gain the competitive edge.

Partners

Acknowledgements

Solar Media