The Silevo R-Series module. Source: Silevo/SolarCity.
The potential loophole for China-based manufacturers to circumvent US trade duties by applying a single thin-film layer to their products has been slammed shut by the Department of Commerce’s ruling against SolarCity’s Silevo products.
The department argued in its ruling that had it excluded Silevo’s amorphous silicon thin-film cells, which use a monocrystalline silicon substrate, from the scope of Chinese trade duties, any product with a single thin-film layer could also sidestep the tariffs.
SolarCity had requested that the Silevo products be excluded from the case. SolarWorld, the petitioner in the case argued that the products met the criteria.
“We are still reviewing the factual and legal analysis, but the Commerce preliminary ruling makes several important points,” said Tim Brightbill, of Wiley Rein, SolarWorld’s lawyer. “First, it finds that a p/i/n junction is simply a type of p/n junction, and therefore subject to the scope of the China trade cases.”
Commerce also stated that “the cells contain a crystalline silicon component that contributes to their photovoltaic function”.
Thirdly, Brightbill points to the circumvention argument. In its preliminary ruling, Commerce stated:
“SolarCity’s simplistic interpretation of the thin film exclusion would extend the scope of the exclusion to encompass virtually all photovoltaic cells so long as they contain a single thin film layer. Such an interpretation would result in a physical description that would easily permit circumvention of the scope of the orders. We do not believe that such an interpretation was intended by the petition or the Department when it issued the scope of the orders.”
Silevo had its pilot line in China until it was relocated to California. The company has moved to downplay the impact of any final ruling, scheduled for June, given its plans to conduct large-scale manufacturing in Buffalo, New York.
“Silevo’s R&D and pilot manufacturing is located in California and we’re building America’s largest solar manufacturing facility in New York to manufacture our high efficiency thin film product in the United States,” Jonathan Bass, VP for communications, SolarCity told PV Tech. “The impact of the ultimate ruling will be limited, but it’s unfortunate that SolarWorld is trying to make solar technology more expensive for customers.”
Mukesh Dulani, president of SolarWorld Americas welcomed the ruling and refuted previous comments by SolarCity claiming that its products were “inferior”.
“The quality of SolarWorld’s products made in America have been the industry standard for 40 years. We know, and our customers know, that they are superior to any product being imported from China today,” said Dulani.
“We are encouraged by this decision, which should help clarify for the industry that these so-called types of ‘hybrid’ products – crystalline-silicon cells with thin film layers – are subject to the scope of the order,” he added.
Following the successful launch of Energy Storage Summit USA, we are pleased to announce its return for a 2nd year. Renowned for its quality, breadth and expertise, this event features an all-encompassing range of strategic and technical sessions on the adoption and deployment of storage. Key market drivers such as the falling price of lithium-ion batteries, investment in electric vehicle infrastructure, FERC Order 841, government incentives, grid modernization, transition from dependency on the networks to a desire for autonomy and intermittent renewable sources, all add to an exciting time for the Energy Storage value chain.
Going into its fifth year over 200 delegates from 150 companies and 20 countries representing the PV supply chain will gather in Malaysia to discuss the technology roadmaps for PV cell advancement in GW markets. The scope of the event has been expanded this year, to cover developments in wafer supply and thin-film investments and technologies alongside all the regular benefits to all stakeholders tracking PV technology and investment trends for the next 5 years.