Yingli Green had renegotiated multiple polysilicon supply contracts by 2013 but stopped purchasing polysilicon from one supplier from 2013 onwards, leading to that supplier seeking arbitration.
Struggling major China-based PV manufacturer Yingli Green Energy is being forced into arbitration at the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) by a major polysilicon producer over a long-term ‘take or pay’ supply contract with damages claimed to be US$897.5 million.
As PV Tech highlighted, Yingli Green recently reported a 2017 annual net loss of US$510 million and a cash position of only US$58.1 million. The company was forced to raise warnings over its ‘going concern’ position.
Like many PV manufacturers around 2007, shortages of polysilicon led to many locking-in fixed price long-term supply contracts that were based on ‘take or pay’ agreements.
By 2011, polysilicon supply had increased significantly and spot market prices has collapsed, leaving companies paying higher prices than the open market and taking the agreed polysilicon contracted quantities and selling the excess of the open market at or loss.
Some major cell producers such as Q Cells, Suntech and last year, SolarWorld, primarily went bankrupt over these ‘take or pay’ supply contracts.
Adding to the recent woes was the decision by China’s Ministry of Industry (MOFCOM) to impose high import duties on overseas polysilicon producers, notably the US at the begining of 2014, as part of a solar trade war with the US.
Yingli Green had renegotiated multiple polysilicon supply contracts by 2013 but stopped purchasing polysilicon from one supplier in 2013 onwards, leading to that supplier seeking arbitration.
Following the successful launch of Energy Storage Summit USA, we are pleased to announce its return for a 2nd year. Renowned for its quality, breadth and expertise, this event features an all-encompassing range of strategic and technical sessions on the adoption and deployment of storage. Key market drivers such as the falling price of lithium-ion batteries, investment in electric vehicle infrastructure, FERC Order 841, government incentives, grid modernization, transition from dependency on the networks to a desire for autonomy and intermittent renewable sources, all add to an exciting time for the Energy Storage value chain.