JA Solar UFLPA factory ‘ceased production in 2018’, SSI claims after investigation

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
JA Solar is a member of SolarPower Europe, which founded the SSI. Image: SolarPower Europe.

A solar manufacturing facility that the US government said was sourcing polysilicon from the Xinjiang region of China reportedly ceased production in 2018, according to an investigation by Europe’s Solar Stewardship Initiative (SSI).

Donghai JA Solar, a subsidiary of major Chinese manufacturer JA Solar, was added to the US government’s Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) entity list earlier this month on the grounds that the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) had “reasonable cause to believe” the company “sources polysilicon from the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR).”

This article requires Premium SubscriptionBasic (FREE) Subscription

Unlock unlimited access for 12 whole months of distinctive global analysis

Photovoltaics International is now included.

  • Regular insight and analysis of the industry’s biggest developments
  • In-depth interviews with the industry’s leading figures
  • Unlimited digital access to the PV Tech Power journal catalogue
  • Unlimited digital access to the Photovoltaics International journal catalogue
  • Access to more than 1,000 technical papers
  • Discounts on Solar Media’s portfolio of events, in-person and virtual

Or continue reading this article for free

Following the DHS’s statement, the SSI suspended JA Solar’s membership of its organisation and launched its own investigation. However, the SSI has now reinstated JA Solar’s membership “with immediate effect” after finding that the “only production site owned by the Donghai JA Solar Technology Co. Ltd … ceased production in 2018.”

The XUAR has been associated with alleged forced labour enforced by the Chinese state on the Uyghur Muslim population, with particular attention paid to quartz mining, metallurgical silicon and polysilicon production, which forms the start of the solar supply chain.

The SSI said its investigation ran between 16-24 January, during which time it sent a “senior member of the SSI Secretariat with a 20-year track record of international, independent third-party assessments accompanied by a translator” to the Donghai JA Solar facility in question.

It also claims to have reviewed “legal and contractual documentation … including polysilicon supply contracts” and held “consultations with relevant stakeholders” including JA Solar staff, “independent solar supply chain experts” and “other industry and non-industry stakeholders.”

In a statement, the SSI board said: “The SSI Board acknowledges the vital role historical reports have played in raising awareness of supply chain risks and driving improvements in environmental, social, governance (ESG) and traceability performance.

“Today, the solar sector’s rapidly evolving ESG and traceability performance means that governments, institutions, investors and NGOs have to rely on up-to-date data, i.e. no older than 12 months, and recognise companies’ publicly available policy management procedures.”

In a statement seen by PV Tech, Aiqing Yang, executive president of JA Solar said: “The conclusion of SSI’s review reaffirms our dedication to ethical sourcing and regulatory compliance. We will continue to work with industry partners to uphold the highest standards in supply chain traceability and responsible procurement.”

Supply chain transparency

The DHS also added two other solar component manufacturers and two of their subsidiaries to its UFLPA entity list along with JA Solar.

The UFLPA puts the burden of proof on manufacturers to actively prove to US customs that their supply chains are free from potential exposure to forced labour. The US government can ban any product from entering the country which cannot provide this evidence.

The SSI, by contrast, is an industry-led organisation that certifies individual manufacturing sites that companies volunteer for third-party inspection. It has two certifications: the ESG Standard, which covers labour, emissions and other ethical practices; and the Supply Chain Traceability Standard, which aims to track silicon throughout the supply chain.

Membership of the SSI only entails a “commitment” to its principles and is distinct from having manufacturing sites certified. The initiative certified its first two manufacturing sites earlier this month under its ESG Standard, from Trinasolar.

In its statement on reinstating JA Solar’s membership, the SSI said: “Donghai JA Solar Technology Co., Ltd has been adapting its sourcing practices as part of the broader JA Solar group’s commitment towards compliance with the SSI’s traceability and certification requirements. It is also noted that the DHS announcement does not state or imply that the US government has established that the JA Solar group owns or operates any entities or facilities in the XUAR, nor that the company uses any forced labour at any of its sites globally.”

Whether or not JA Solar owns or operates facilities directly in Xinjiang is effectively irrelevant to the UFLPA’s methodology, as it encompasses a company’s inputs and suppliers up the supply chain. The SSI Supply Chain Traceability Standard, published in December, aims to do the same.

Critics of the SSI have said that it lacks the power to enforce meaningful supply traceability, as companies can volunteer for certification and are only assessed at individual manufacturing sites, leaving others unaccounted for.

In a post on LinkedIn, Michael Parr, executive director of the Ultra Low Carbon Solar Alliance, an organisation focused on solar supply chains, said: “The idea that, with a fraction of the resources of the US government, the SSI could determine in that very brief period that JA’s supply chains are not tainted with forced labour strains credulity and does not bolster confidence in the programme.”

In conversation with PV Tech, Alexia Ruvoletto, head of the SSI Secretariat, said the initiative was “strict” and that the involvement of the industry in its processes “makes it more implementable on the ground” and “more effective”.

This article was updated to include comments from JA Solar

17 June 2025
Napa, USA
PV Tech has been running PV ModuleTech Conferences since 2017. PV ModuleTech USA, on 17-18 June 2025, will be our fourth PV ModulelTech conference dedicated to the U.S. utility scale solar sector. The event will gather the key stakeholders from solar developers, solar asset owners and investors, PV manufacturing, policy-making and and all interested downstream channels and third-party entities. The goal is simple: to map out the PV module supply channels to the U.S. out to 2026 and beyond.
7 October 2025
San Francisco Bay Area, USA
PV Tech has been running an annual PV CellTech Conference since 2016. PV CellTech USA, on 7-8 October 2025 is our third PV CellTech conference dedicated to the U.S. manufacturing sector. The events in 2023 and 2024 were a sell out success and 2025 will once again gather the key stakeholders from PV manufacturing, equipment/materials, policy-making and strategy, capital equipment investment and all interested downstream channels and third-party entities. The goal is simple: to map out PV manufacturing in the U.S. out to 2030 and beyond.
21 October 2025
New York, USA
Returning for its 12th edition, Solar and Storage Finance USA Summit remains the annual event where decision-makers at the forefront of solar and storage projects across the United States and capital converge. Featuring the most active solar and storage transactors, join us for a packed two-days of deal-making, learning and networking.
2 December 2025
Málaga, Spain
Understanding PV module supply to the European market in 2026. PV ModuleTech Europe 2025 is a two-day conference that tackles these challenges directly, with an agenda that addresses all aspects of module supplier selection; product availability, technology offerings, traceability of supply-chain, factory auditing, module testing and reliability, and company bankability.
10 March 2026
Frankfurt, Germany
The conference will gather the key stakeholders from PV manufacturing, equipment/materials, policy-making and strategy, capital equipment investment and all interested downstream channels and third-party entities. The goal is simple: to map out PV manufacturing out to 2030 and beyond.

Read Next

June 11, 2025
Origis Energy has secured a financing package from MUFG to support the development of a 350MW solar portfolio in the US.
June 11, 2025
Lab-tested solar module performance has improved over the last year, according to data from US-based technical advisory firm RETC.
June 11, 2025
The leading crystalline silicon solar manufacturers have shipped a record 500GW of PV modules in 2024, according to a report from analysts Wood Mackenzie.
June 11, 2025
A new report has claimed that creating a Sydney renewable energy zone (REZ) in New South Wales, Australia, could generate up to 21GW of renewable energy from rooftop solar PV.
June 11, 2025
Venn Energy, a renewable energy developer, has seen its 500MW Cooba solar-plus-storage site selected for inclusion in Victoria’s Development Facilitation Program (DFP) scheme in Australia.
June 10, 2025
A group of Republican Congress members penned an open letter on Friday urging the US Senate to moderate proposed changes to renewable energy manufacturing and deployment support.

Subscribe to Newsletter

Upcoming Events

Solar Media Events
June 17, 2025
Napa, USA
Upcoming Webinars
June 30, 2025
10am PST / 6pm BST
Solar Media Events
July 1, 2025
London, UK
Solar Media Events
July 1, 2025
London, UK
Media Partners, Solar Media Events
July 2, 2025
Bangkok, Thailand