BP intends to amass a renewables portfolio with a 50GW capacity by 2030. Image: BP.
BP has set its sights on amassing a 50GW renewables portfolio by 2030 as it lays out its strategy to become a net zero company.
Along with its Q2 results today, the oil and gas major set out a plan to increase its investment into low carbon generation tenfold. This would see it grow to $5 billion a year, up from $0.5 billion currently with an interim target of $3-4 billion by 2025.
The company’s solar arm, Lightsource BP is currently targeting around 10GW of solar globally by 2023, and today’s announcement could see this jump significantly.
Along with renewables investment, BP is also hoping to place itself at the forefront of the hydrogen sector with a 10% share of core markets and the carbon capture, utilisation and storage (CCUS) sector. Additionally, it is planning to grow it’s bioenergy business from 22,000 b/d in 2019 to more than 100,000 b/d by 2030.
CEO Bernard Looney said the company could bring over 100 years of experience “steeped in the world of energy” to BP's transition from a fossil fuel company to an integrated energy company.
“We understand energy markets deeply, and have developed unique capabilities in trading, marketing, technology and innovation,” he continued. And we are not starting from scratch in this new world.
“From our Lightsource bp joint venture – now in 13 countries – to our electric vehicle charging partnership with DiDi in China, and our industry-leading convenience partnerships with M&S in the UK and REWE in Germany – we are already building scale and capability.”
Along with this growth in renewables, the company will reduce its production of oil and gas by 40% by actively managing its portfolio. It has also committed to undertaking no exploration in new countries.
BP’s strategy for net zero were released along with its Q2 results, which saw it’s dividend ‘reset’ at 5.25 cents per share it announced today, down from 10.5 cents/share, and this will stay fixed at this level to help manage the uncertainty created by COVID-19. This marked change is in line with its plan to become more resilient it said, and has committed to returning at least 60% of surplus cash as share buybacks to further support this.
It recorded a loss of $6.7 billion in underlying replacement costs, a dramatic change in comparison to the same period on 2019 when there was a profit of $2.9 billion. This was driven by decarbonisation strategies impact on its price assumptions, along with record low oil and gas prices and dramatic reductions in demand drive by COVID-19.
Its reported loss for the quarter was $16.8 billion, a fall from a profit of $1.8 billion during Q2 2019, again impact by a revision in price impacts as it sets it move away from oil production.
Looney said the results were driven by "another very challenging quarter" as well as the steps the company was taken to "reimagine energy and reinvent bp."
“Beneath these, however, our performance remained resilient, with good cashflow and – most importantly – safe and reliable operations.”
BP first announced that it would become a net zero company in February, with the newly appointed Looney stating the company would need to “fundamentally reorganise”. The impact of this has already been felt, with actions to become a “leaner, faster-moving and lower carbon company” accelerated due to challenges presented by COVID-19.
Speaking of BP’s dividend, Luke Parker, Wood Mackenzie vice president of Corporate Analysis said: “But if ever there was a moment to reset, this was it. Several factors have converged to make it possible: coronavirus and everything that comes with it; a strategic pivot to net-zero on the horizon; Shell’s dividend reset; a new leadership with credit in the bank. Our view is that BP has taken the prudent course of action."
Jan 20, 2021 GMT
Virtually all PV modules for large-scale utility-based solar sites are imported to the US, especially from Chinese companies using manufacturing sites across Southeast Asia. This puts extreme pressure on US site developers, EPCs and investors, in understanding fully the differences between the companies offering imported PV modules How credible are the companies supplying the products? What is the financial health of the parent entity? Where is the module produced, and is this undertaken in-house or through third-party OEMs? What is the supply-chain for the module sub-components including wafers and cells? And then, how will the modules perform in the field, and is it possible to gauge reliability levels benchmarked against competitors? This webinar will provide insights from two of the leading experts in PV module manufacturing, supply, performance and reliability: Jenya Meydbray of PV Evolution Labs and Finlay Colville from PV-Tech. The 1-hour session will include presentations from Jenya and Finlay, and then a brand-new supplier scorecard matrix that combines the key outputs from PVEL's Module Reliability Scorecard and PV-Tech's PV ModuleTech Bankability Ratings, with specific focus on module supply and use in the US market.