Whilst growth is slower than it would be under the forecast including the Clean Power Plan, the EIA predicts an expansion for renewables in its absence nevertheless. Source: Flickr/Gerry Machen
Even if president-elect Trump follows through with his threats to dismantle the Clean Power Plan, renewable energy will still be on the rise regardless, according to a new report by the US Energy Information Administration.
The report, entitled Annual Energy Outlook 2017, contains long-term projects up to 2050 that indicate that clean energy and natural gas will continue to grow, even in the scenario where the CPP is omitted. The administration warns that the outlook is not a prediction, however, but a series of potential options the nation could follow dependent on certain circumstances.
"Even if the CPP is not implemented, low natural gas prices and the tax credits result in natural gas and renewables as the primary sources of new generation capacity," the EIA report reads.
The emissions regulation, penned by the EPA under the Obama administration, is currently stayed while subject to judicial review by the Supreme Court as part of a legal battle that asserts the EPA is guilty of overreach.
Even without the contentious proceedings, the CPP is endangered by threats by Trump to dismantle it, and other federal spending on any regulations pertaining to climate change.
The EIA contends however that the primary driver of new alternative electricity capacity will be an ongoing series of coal-fired plant retirements. Report forecasts detail that without the CPP, coal generation will still remain steady through the 2020, and whilst at a slower rate than with the emission regulations in place, renewables and natural gas will continue to expand.
Furthermore, if Trump scraps the CPP has he has been so called on to do by a 24-state coalition spearheaded by West Virginia AG Patrick Morrisey, energy-related carbon emissions would increase.
Energy-related carbon dioxide emissions. Source: Energy Information Administration
However, in the case without the CPP, the declining cost of natural gas is still encouraging utilities to shift away from coal. Utilities retired 1.48GW of coal-generating capacity in 2015, according to the EIA, representing about 5% of US coal-generating capacity.
Another 6.5GW of coal-fired generation were retired in the first half of 2016.
The EIA expects almost 70GW of new wind and solar capacity to be added by 2021, with utility-scale solar being the main driver for renewable capacity additions; spurred on by declining costs and the ITC. After 2030, natural gas is forecast to catch up, with new capacity to be split between the two energy sources.
Annual electricity generating capacity additions and retirements. Source: Energy Information Administration
Whilst EIA predictions for both renewables and emissions fared better under the scenario with the CPP, many feel that the decline of fossil fuels is more economic driven than regulatory. In fact, outgoing EPA administrator Gina McCarthy said critics give the CPP “too much credit” during a speech in November.
“The CPP was designed to follow the clean energy transition that was already underway, the one that the energy market depends on and the one that the energy market will continue to demand,” she said. McCarthy also noted that 24 states already had lower emissions in 2015 than required by 2022 under the plan.
Despite confirmation from the EIA that the renewable energy outlook remains positive in the absence of the Plan, contention over its fate continues with 15 states planning to litigate if Trump does scrap the regulation.
Jan 20, 2021 GMT
Virtually all PV modules for large-scale utility-based solar sites are imported to the US, especially from Chinese companies using manufacturing sites across Southeast Asia. This puts extreme pressure on US site developers, EPCs and investors, in understanding fully the differences between the companies offering imported PV modules How credible are the companies supplying the products? What is the financial health of the parent entity? Where is the module produced, and is this undertaken in-house or through third-party OEMs? What is the supply-chain for the module sub-components including wafers and cells? And then, how will the modules perform in the field, and is it possible to gauge reliability levels benchmarked against competitors? This webinar will provide insights from two of the leading experts in PV module manufacturing, supply, performance and reliability: Jenya Meydbray of PV Evolution Labs and Finlay Colville from PV-Tech. The 1-hour session will include presentations from Jenya and Finlay, and then a brand-new supplier scorecard matrix that combines the key outputs from PVEL's Module Reliability Scorecard and PV-Tech's PV ModuleTech Bankability Ratings, with specific focus on module supply and use in the US market.