Indian government softens domestic content rules for second phase of solar mission

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email

The Indian government has signed off the first 750MW batch of tenders under the second phase of the Jawaharlal Nehru National Solar Mission with a softening of domestic content rules.

The first phase required the use of modules based on crystalline technology to be manufactured in India. Many developers opted for thin-film modules instead.

This article requires Premium SubscriptionBasic (FREE) Subscription

Unlock unlimited access for 12 whole months of distinctive global analysis

Photovoltaics International is now included.

  • Regular insight and analysis of the industry’s biggest developments
  • In-depth interviews with the industry’s leading figures
  • Unlimited digital access to the PV Tech Power journal catalogue
  • Unlimited digital access to the Photovoltaics International journal catalogue
  • Access to more than 1,000 technical papers
  • Discounts on Solar Media’s portfolio of events, in-person and virtual

Or continue reading this article for free

In the first offering from the second phase, 375MW of the available capacity will be subject to domestic content rules and half will not. Phase two of the solar mission is set to run from 2013-2017.

The reverse auction process will continue with the lowest cost project proposals winning out.

Electricity from successful bidders will be purchased for Rs5.45/kWh (US$0.089/kWh) by the Solar Energy Corporation of India (SECI) under a 25-year agreement.

Earlier this year, Mercom Capital warned that the pursuit of the lowest cost could damage the solar industry in India in the longer term. It claimed that by driving down quality, investors were being put off.

Raj Prabhu, CEO of Mercom Capital, told PV Tech earlier this month that the Viability Gap Funding (VGF) mechanism brought in for the second phase of the JNNSM would not necessarily prevent a race to the bottom. Under VGF, bidders estimate the cost of their projects and the government funds the difference between that and the projected returns, in this instance the fixed rate in the power purchase agreement.

“We [Mercom Capital] question this VGF system as it has not typically worked so well in infrastructure projects [in other sectors]. Following an upfront payment, the developer has less incentive to care,” said Prabhu.

Read Next

June 17, 2025
New solar manufacturing facilities show higher rates of product defects, PV Tech has heard from Joerg Althaus of Clean Energy Associates.
Premium
June 17, 2025
PV Tech spoke with Joerg Althaus of CEA about the under-explored issues with solar racking, trackers and other technical concerns.
June 17, 2025
The European Investment Bank (EIB) will invest €1.6 billion to support the construction of the Bay of Biscay interconnector.
Premium
June 17, 2025
Traditional PV inspection methods using direct current polarisation have proved unreliable in detecting certain issues. Researchers from Enertis Applus+ detail a new approach to defect detection aimed at improving the efficiency of PV system maintenance and performance analysis.
June 17, 2025
The levelised cost of energy (LCOE) for utility-scale solar PV in the US has tightened for a third year in a row, according to Lazard’s latest report.
June 17, 2025
Blue Elephant Energy has received a €200 million (US$214 million) investment from European asset management company Infranity.

Subscribe to Newsletter

Upcoming Events

Solar Media Events
June 17, 2025
Napa, USA
Upcoming Webinars
June 30, 2025
10am PST / 6pm BST
Solar Media Events
July 1, 2025
London, UK
Solar Media Events
July 1, 2025
London, UK
Media Partners, Solar Media Events
July 2, 2025
Bangkok, Thailand