EU withdraws Shinetime China from MIP

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
The Commission found that Shinetime China breached the undertaking by selling below the MIP via an allegedly unrelated importer in the EU. Credit: Friends of Europe

The European Commission has withdrawn Chinese solar panel manufacturer Shinetime China and its related company in the EU, Shinetime Europe, from the EU-China price undertaking.

The Minimum Import Price (MIP) agreement allows Chinese firms to avoid anti-dumping duties in the EU in return for agreeing to annual import quotas and selling above a pre-determined price.

This article requires Premium SubscriptionBasic (FREE) Subscription

Try Premium for just $1

  • Full premium access for the first month at only $1
  • Converts to an annual rate after 30 days unless cancelled
  • Cancel anytime during the trial period

Premium Benefits

  • Expert industry analysis and interviews
  • Digital access to PV Tech Power journal
  • Exclusive event discounts

Or get the full Premium subscription right away

Or continue reading this article for free

The Commission found that Shinetime China breached the undertaking by selling below the MIP via an allegedly unrelated importer in the EU.

Evidence was found that this allegedly unrelated importer shared the same address as Shinetime Europe for a certain period of time. It had also issued two re-sale invoices for one transaction of solar modules to its final customer. One of the invoices respected the MIP and the other did not. Meanwhile, the invoice numbers, volume of modules and company product codes were identical.

The payment from the customer was made to Shinetime China, but it corresponded to the invoice value for which the MIP was not respected. This was found to have occurred on at least one occasion.

Evidence of MIP undertaking circumvention was also found on another occassion after Shinetime China issued a pro-forma invoice below the MIP to an unrelated customer in the Union. The customer then paid below the MIP amount to Shinetime China's account in Hong Kong.

In June last year, China-based manufacturers Canadian Solar, ReneSola and ET Solar were all officially removed from the price undertaking. ZN Shine followed at a later date.

Any exporting producer may voluntarily withdraw its undertaking at any time during its application. Thus, Trina announced plans to walk away from the undertaking in December last year. The Commission officially withdrew Trina from the undertaking in January this year.

Read Next

October 21, 2026
China’s Ministry of Commerce is proposing to introduce export controls on key PV components, including polysilicon, wafers and cells.
October 19, 2026
JinkoSolar's Tiger Neo 5.0, an all-black residential PV module, is built on its TOPCon-based Amorphous-Si Passivating Cell (TAC) technology.
October 16, 2026
Shangai ports handled 16 cases involving solar PV products suspected of infringing on IP with a total value of more than US$750,000.
October 16, 2026
Leading domestic polysilicon players in China’s PV industry held a closed‑door meeting to curb destructive price competition.
October 15, 2026
Sungrow has patched an iSolarCloud vulnerability that reportedly allowed unauthenticated access to platform accounts, according to reports.
October 14, 2026
The Becquerel Institute has released a segment briefing on the potential impact that AI and robotics can have on solar PV installations.

Upcoming Events

Solar Media Events
November 3, 2026
Málaga, Spain
Solar Media Events
November 24, 2026
Warsaw, Poland
Solar Media Events
February 2, 2027
London, UK
Solar Media Events
April 20, 2027
Istanbul, Türkiye