Discover our upstream and downstream technical journals
APS wants the commission to approve a US$3.6 billion investment over the next three years, which would result in an average annual bill increase of 7.96% for residential customers. Source: Arizona Public Service

APS wants the commission to approve a US$3.6 billion investment over the next three years, which would result in an average annual bill increase of 7.96% for residential customers. Source: Arizona Public Service

Arizona Public Service (APS) has requested the Arizona Corporation Commission for the first rate review in five years, with proposals that include an unprecedented mandatory demand charge and the elimination of net-metering.

Specifically, APS wants the commission to approve a US$3.6 billion investment over the next three years, which would result in an average annual bill increase of 7.96% for residential customers. APS is also asking the ACC to approve a lower volumetric charge and three demand charge options for residential customers:

The first two options are for US$6.60kW and US$8.40kW and would remain stale for both the winter and summer months. The third option, designed for high peak usage, was pitched at US$16.40kW for summer and US$11.50kW for winter. A flat-rate bill option would be made available for customers who do not wish to actively manage their energy use, according to the filing.

APS is not the first utility to try and impose residential demand charge options on its customers. Chicago’s ComEd has recently come under fire with its controversial Next Generation Energy Plan, which unsuccessfully sought to introduce a mandatory demand charge. Fellow Arizonan public utility Salt River Project actually instituted a demand charge for its customers at the beginning of this year.

The proposals were met with some cynicism from the solar industry, especially as Arizona was once considered a pioneer for rooftop solar; but has seen progress decline due to internal utility attacks.

Kris Mayes, of the Energy Freedom Coalition of America (EFCA), voiced concern about the APS proposal in a statement: "Demand charges are a dangerous plan that will force customers to constantly monitor their energy use out of fear of exorbitant charges. They especially penalize customers who have made substantial investments to reduce energy and contribute to more resilient Arizona energy future.

"The loss of net metering in Arizona would mean the loss of thousands of jobs and consumer choice. Arizona will take a giant step backwards in transforming its energy future if this proposal is approved."

"This effort by APS to impose demand charges poses a serious setback to the ability of all Arizonans to produce their own power," said Dru Bacon, co-chairman of The Conservative Alliance for Solar Energy (CASE). "We call on the Commission to reject this anti-competitive plan."

APS, for its part, insinuated that net-metering was outdated. “It’s time for our industry to adapt its pricing model to reflect new energy technologies and the changing way customers are using electricity,” said Don Brandt, CEO of APS, in a statement. “There will be the usual naysayers who want to protect the status quo for their short-term financial gain, but Arizona has delayed too long already.”

The utility’s proposals in the its filing are subject to review by the ACC. This process is expected to take around a year. 

Tags: us, usa, arizona, net metering, utility, residential, finance

Upcoming Webinars

Revealing the most bankable and reliable PV module suppliers for utility-scale deployment in the US

Jan 20, 2021 GMT

Virtually all PV modules for large-scale utility-based solar sites are imported to the US, especially from Chinese companies using manufacturing sites across Southeast Asia. This puts extreme pressure on US site developers, EPCs and investors, in understanding fully the differences between the companies offering imported PV modules How credible are the companies supplying the products? What is the financial health of the parent entity? Where is the module produced, and is this undertaken in-house or through third-party OEMs? What is the supply-chain for the module sub-components including wafers and cells? And then, how will the modules perform in the field, and is it possible to gauge reliability levels benchmarked against competitors? This webinar will provide insights from two of the leading experts in PV module manufacturing, supply, performance and reliability: Jenya Meydbray of PV Evolution Labs and Finlay Colville from PV-Tech. The 1-hour session will include presentations from Jenya and Finlay, and then a brand-new supplier scorecard matrix that combines the key outputs from PVEL's Module Reliability Scorecard and PV-Tech's PV ModuleTech Bankability Ratings, with specific focus on module supply and use in the US market.

Register now

Solar Media Events

Utility Solar Summit, UK & Ireland

May 26 - May 27, 2021

ONLINE

Looking at the drivers and dynamics of utility scale solar in the UK & Ireland over the next five years. This event will consider the immediate challenges as we enter the build phase in both these markets where we could see as much as 4GW deployed in 2021 alone! What developments will continue the growth of 100MW+ sites and what impact will government policy have on the rate of deployment in both markets?Join leading developers and manufacturers shaping the direction of one of Europe’s most active markets and hear from speakers with a history of influencing innovation and change.

Find out more

Solar Media Events

Solar Finance & Investment Europe

Feb 03 - Feb 04, 2021

ONLINE

The business of solar is changing, as the industry scales up, technology, IT and new players to the market will add complexity. This sparks a host of opportunities such as co-location of solar and storage and the rise of unsubsidised solar projects as well as challenges which will question the very business model of European solar asset owners. Solar Finance & Investment Europe is the meeting place for institutional investors, sovereign wealth funds, solar, wind and storage funds and large energy buyers to do business.

Find out more

Comments