Auxin Solar has asked the US Department of Commerce to investigate whether Southeast Asia-based companies are circumventing US anti-dumping and countervailing duty (AD/CVD) orders on cells and modules from China.
California-based module manufacturer Auxin has requested that Commerce carry out anti-circumvention inquiries into assemblers of crystalline silicon PV (CSPV) cells and modules in Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam and Cambodia that it alleges use affiliated Chinese input suppliers and a fully integrated Chinese supply chain to circumvent the orders.
Try Premium for just $1
- Full premium access for the first month at only $1
- Converts to an annual rate after 30 days unless cancelled
- Cancel anytime during the trial period
Premium Benefits
- Expert industry analysis and interviews
- Digital access to PV Tech Power journal
- Exclusive event discounts
Or get the full Premium subscription right away
Or continue reading this article for free
The move comes three months after Commerce rejected another petition requesting investigations into alleged AD/CVD circumvention, with the department citing the anonymity of the petitioners.
Following that decision, the group behind that petition – the American Solar Manufacturers Against Chinese Circumvention (A-SMACC) – said it was “evaluating all options”, including refiling a petition “satisfying the Commerce Department’s concerns”.
While A-SMACC had said that the AD/CVD petition was “vital” for US solar manufacturing, trade body the Solar Energy Industries Association warned in September that proposed duties on imports from Southeast Asian countries could jeopardise the deployment of 18GW of US solar by 2023.
In documents sent to Commerce, Auxin Solar said that since the imposition of AD/CVD orders in 2012, imports of CSPV cells and modules from China have declined dramatically and have been replaced completely by imports from Southeast Asian countries, which now account for most cell and module shipments into the US.
The company’s petition, submitted yesterday (8 February), suggests Commerce has 30 days to make a decision on whether to initiate inquiries.
“This is yet a new risk for the US solar industry,” analysts at investment bank Roth Capital Partners said in a note, adding that the tariffs would be retroactive to the date Commerce takes the case on.
Auxin Solar was among the companies that last year called for the US to extend Section 201 import tariffs. The Biden administration confirmed last week that the tariffs will be extended for another four years, with bifacial panels continuing to be exempt.
