Call for Japan and EU to be included in India solar dumping probe

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email

Indian solar companies who successfully petitioned for an investigation into alleged dumping of modules from China, the US, Taiwan and Malaysia, have called for the inquiry to include Japan and the EU.

A week after India’s Department of Commerce held the first hearing of the initial anti-dumping inquiry, Jupiter Solar Power, Indosolar and Websol Energy have reportedly petitioned for the scope of the investigation to be widened.

This article requires Premium SubscriptionBasic (FREE) Subscription

Unlock unlimited access for 12 whole months of distinctive global analysis

Photovoltaics International is now included.

  • Regular insight and analysis of the industry’s biggest developments
  • In-depth interviews with the industry’s leading figures
  • Unlimited digital access to the PV Tech Power journal catalogue
  • Unlimited digital access to the Photovoltaics International journal catalogue
  • Access to more than 1,000 technical papers
  • Discounts on Solar Media’s portfolio of events, in-person and virtual

Or continue reading this article for free

The inclusion of Japan and the EU into the investigations would mean companies such as Sharp, Solar Frontier, Solibro and others come under scrutiny for allegedly selling cells below domestic manufacturer prices.

However, according to Bloomberg, it is unclear whether there is sufficient support for the petition under World Trade Organization rules for it to be upheld.

India’s anti-dumping investigation has split the Indian solar industry in two. Members of the Solar Independent Power Producers Association (SIPPA), representing solar power producers, are against any trade duties on foreign imports, arguing that India’s domestic manufacturers are too new to be competitive with longer established foreign companies.

Welspun Energy CEO Vineet Mittal and other petitioners told local newspaper The Economic Times: “Indian solar industry is quite new and they invested in archaic technology. We need to wait for another 3-4 years for the domestic solar manufacturing industry to come of age and be technologically competitive.”

RESolve energy consultant, Madhavan Nampoothiri said the internal domestic dispute between developers and manufacturers was scaring investors away from India’s solar industry. “There will definitely be uncertainty due to the anti-dumping investigations, because the ruling based on the investigation will have an impact on the import of modules and the prices of modules available in the country. This will affect the investor sentiment.”

Read Next

April 29, 2025
Chinese solar manufacturing giant JinkoSolar posted net losses of US$181.7 million in the first quarter of 2025 amid low product prices and “changes in international trade policies.”
April 29, 2025
The recent domestic content regulations and trade policies have prompted caution in the US from suppliers for long-term projections, according to a report from Anza.
April 29, 2025
Reassessing the role distributed solar operators have to play in minimising cybersecurity risks is key to Europe's solar cybersecurity.
April 29, 2025
Developer Nexamp has closed a US$340 million debt refinancing for a portfolio of distributed solar and energy storage projects in the US.
Premium
April 29, 2025
“There is an adjustment in the industry [where] there are cycles,” explains Laura Fortes, senior manager for access to finance at GOGLA.
April 29, 2025
Solar cannot be regarded as a 'set and forget' technology and must be fully maintained to prevent systemic underperformance.

Subscribe to Newsletter

Upcoming Events

Media Partners, Solar Media Events
May 7, 2025
Munich, Germany
Solar Media Events
May 21, 2025
London, UK
Solar Media Events
June 17, 2025
Napa, USA
Solar Media Events
July 1, 2025
London, UK
Solar Media Events
July 1, 2025
London, UK