Solar PV equipment spending was US$3.6 billion for 2012 from US$12.9 billion in 2011, according to new research in the latest NPD Solarbuzz PV Equipment Quarterly report.
Covering c-Si ingot-to-module and thin-film, the report says spending for 2013 could drop to levels not seen in the industry since 2006.
Unlock unlimited access for 12 whole months of distinctive global analysis
Photovoltaics International is now included.
- Regular insight and analysis of the industry’s biggest developments
- In-depth interviews with the industry’s leading figures
- Unlimited digital access to the PV Tech Power journal catalogue
- Unlimited digital access to the Photovoltaics International journal catalogue
- Access to more than 1,000 technical papers
- Discounts on Solar Media’s portfolio of events, in-person and virtual
Or continue reading this article for free
“Spending for 2013 is forecast to decline even further to US$2.2 billion, ” said Finlay Colville, Vice-President of NPD Solarbuzz.
“Spending on high-efficiency process steps barely contributed to 2012 shipments, representing less than 5% of PV equipment spending.”
NPD Solarbuzz has identified GT Advanced Technologies, Meyer Burger, Applied Materials and Apollo Solar as the leading equipment suppliers to look out for this year. The market analyst group expects these tool suppliers to have PV-specific revenues in excess of US$400 million. Only eight PV equipment suppliers are forecast to have PV-specific revenues during 2012 in excess of US$100 million, compared to 23 in 2011.
Just 24 months ago, GT Advanced Technologies, Meyer Burger, Applied Materials, and Centrotherm each reported PV backlogs at or above US$1 billion. However, successive quarters with minimal new order intake, coupled with strong de-bookings, have reduced PV equipment backlogs to levels last experienced in the first half of 2006.
“PV equipment suppliers now find themselves a victim of their own success,” added Colville.
“Excessive investment in 2010 and 2011 was the catalyst of the over-capacity and over-supply situation that exists today. It was also a key factor in end-market price erosion that forced many of their customers to file for insolvency. The days of PV-specific backlogs and revenues at the billion-dollar level are unlikely to be repeated for at least three years.”
With so much competitive c-Si capacity shipped during 2011 and 2012, NPD Solarbuzz states that the biggest fear for tool suppliers is the emergence of a secondary equipment market across China and Taiwan. Most importantly, this would delay any upturn in equipment spending. However, it also suggests that the PV industry is not conforming to a collective roadmap or experiencing a significant technology-buy cycle.
“Today, there are actually two factors that may result in legacy capacity being recycled,” noted Colville. “First, the forced consolidation of tier one and tier two c-Si manufacturers in China would prevent any strong shakeout of excess capacity within China. Also, trade wars may result in surplus capacity simply being relocated outside China to avoid import tariffs, with overseas countries welcoming any resulting job creation.”
NPD Solarbuzz said that during 2012, performing a market-share analysis for key tool suppliers to the PV industry was of limited value due to a large part of revenues based on tools shipped at the end of 2011 or new shipments required by legacy contracts. Indeed, the focus of equipment suppliers has now shifted from gaining market share within the PV industry to deciding how to restructure manufacturing and streamline PV R&D.
“Tool suppliers are finally acknowledging that high-efficiency upgrades are not going to offer any short-term salvation during 2013,” concluded Colville. “However, it remains imperative to equipment suppliers that efforts remain targeted at enhancing efficiency and understanding which technology roadmap will help them gain market share when spending finally returns.”