Solarcity files legal complaint with New Zealand’s EA over discriminatory ‘solar tax’

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
Solarcity's legal complaints contend that the higher lines charges for solar customers is an abuse of monopoly power and contrary to the Electricity Industry Participation Code. Source: Flickr - steakpinball

The solar energy industry is fighting back against taxes being imposed by lines companies [grid operators] on customers installing solar PV panels on their homes, by taking a case to the Electricity Authority.

The higher lines charge has prompted New Zealand power provider Solarcity to file a series of legal complaints with its Electiricty Authority (EA) today, asking it to stop electricity solutions group Unison Energy’s ‘solar tax’, on the grounds that it wrongfully disadvantages customers and is in clear violation of the Electricity Industry Participation Code on two counts.

This article requires Premium SubscriptionBasic (FREE) Subscription

Unlock unlimited access for 12 whole months of distinctive global analysis

Photovoltaics International is now included.

  • Regular insight and analysis of the industry’s biggest developments
  • In-depth interviews with the industry’s leading figures
  • Unlimited digital access to the PV Tech Power journal catalogue
  • Unlimited digital access to the Photovoltaics International journal catalogue
  • Access to more than 1,000 technical papers
  • Discounts on Solar Media’s portfolio of events, in-person and virtual

Or continue reading this article for free

Last month, Hawke’s Bay-based Unison became the first line company in New Zealand to increase line charges for residential customers who generate their own electricity. Customers who use a combination of solar energy and electricity in the grid in the catchment areas of Hawke’s Bay, Taupo and Rotorua are now subject to higher fees for new installations, while existing customers will stay on their current rate until March 2019.

But since the Unison charge was publicised, Solarcity has alleged that other lines companies have introduced – or are deliberating over introducing – additional charges by stealth. For example, WEL Networks has also added solar charges that tax customers for power they export for free.

Unison defended its actions by contending that solar electricity users who connected to its network had been subsidised by other power consumers, so a lift in charges was necessary.

Solarcity however argued in its complaint to the EA that Unison’s decision to unilaterally increase charges would add up to hundreds of dollars per year, and are contrary to ambitions and incentives signed under the Paris Climate Agreement, which was recently ratified in New York.

“While Unison doesn’t like the choices its customers are making, and doesn’t like losing revenue to solar, in New Zealand, we expect companies to respond to competition and innovation with better service, lower costs, and increased efficiency, not punish them with unfair charges,” said Andrew Booth, Solarcity CEO, in a statement. “What Unison – and indeed other companies – are doing is unacceptable, unlawful, and a clear abuse of monopoly power.

“New Zealand’s record on climate change, with the recent decision to keep Huntly open, is rapidly impacting our nation’s history of leadership, which has always seen us step up when the world needs us most.

“Solar has an important role in building a 100% renewable future for our world and climate scientists have told us that this is the decade to take decisive action to prevent catastrophic global warming.

“One roof at a time, kiwis across the nation are showing they want to work together to win the planetary race to be the first to be 100% renewable. The Electricity Authority and the government must take decisive action to prevent them being taxed and marginalised by monopoly businesses who put profit before people and the environment.”

Solarcity also contended that Unison’s charge was likely to result in fewer residents installing solar panels, leading to less take-up of renewable energy. However, a March 2016 report released by the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment, Jan Wright, concluded that solar panels contributed minimally to reducing New Zealand’s carbon footprint. In winter the CO2 emissions from generating electricity reach their peak, with solar panels being most effective in summer.

In addition, Unison business assurance general manager Nathan Strong said in widely reported statements that customers with solar would continue to pay lower annual charges under their new approach than a non-solar customer.

In any event, Solarcity’s legal complaints have started a crucial dialogue over monopoly powers exercised by state utilities. 

Read Next

June 12, 2024
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) research shows that the use of solar panels on US homes can cut energy burden to as low as 1.3%.
June 12, 2024
Ethical Power has obtained planning consent for a 65MW solar PV development in Selwyn District, just outside Christchurch, New Zealand.
June 11, 2024
The Sun Investment Group (SIG) has secured a debt facility to support its development of 1.97GW of new solar capacity in Poland.
June 11, 2024
US insurer kWh Analytics has released its latest Solar Risk Assessment report, which explores how extreme weather is affecting solar farms.
June 11, 2024
The Austrian government has introduced a “made in Europe” subsidy bonus for European photovoltaic components.
June 11, 2024
The Clean Energy Council has called for a national strategy to support the uptake of rooftop solar and battery storage in Australia.

Subscribe to Newsletter

Upcoming Events

Solar Media Events
July 2, 2024
Athens, Greece
Solar Media Events
July 9, 2024
Sands Expo and Convention Centre, Singapore
Solar Media Events
September 24, 2024
Warsaw, Poland
Solar Media Events
September 24, 2024
Singapore, Asia