Minnesota legislators vote to end state Solar Incentive Programme

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on reddit
Share on email
Republican legislators are not fans of the programme; questioning its economic fruits and lack of legislative oversight. Source: Flickr/steakpinball

In a 76-49 vote last week, Republican legislators voted to get rid of Minnesota’s solar incentive programme that has seen homeowners and businesses install thousands of panels since its inception in 2013.

Bill H.F. 235, which awaits review from the Senate, puts a premature end to the 10-year incentive programme, which drummed up local business through the requirement of PV and CSP equipment having to be certified in the state.

The Minnesota House of Representatives said that the US$15 million programme costs too much for the little number of jobs it creates.

The programme had been successful however in a number of state projects that had been administered through the Department of Commerce in Minnesota. As of last year, almost 1,100 solar projects had been implemented since the initiative was started. Therefore, it is likely that scrapping the programme will have a detrimental effect on Minnesota’s solar market.

Minnesota’s nascent solar industry skyrocketed in 2016, jumping from 35MW of installed capacity to 250MW by the end of last year. Without the incentives, these figures may not continue to rise at their current rate. The Commerce Department expects that by 2018 Minnesota could have nearly four times the solar capacity it has today.

“Our members established their businesses here with the promise there would be US$15 million allocated annually, that this state was interested in solar broadly and that you all would continue to support us. This programme brought companies, and then companies brought jobs and the jobs fed families.” David Schaffer, of the Minnesota Solar Energy Industry Association told CNBC.

The ‘Made in Minnesota’ incentive programme has been under fire from Republicans since January this year, when they expressed want for more legislative oversight of the state’s energy funds, rather than contracting out to private companies – which in this case is Xcel Energy.

Representative Pat Garofalo called the programme “an embarrassment to the state” and said the legislature should have control of the renewable energy fund. He referenced a review done by the Office of Legislative Auditor suggesting that more oversight of the fund was needed to increase accountability.

Read Next

December 9, 2021
Investment firm KKR has launched a new utility-scale solar and energy storage development platform, dubbed Stellar Renewable Power.
December 8, 2021
Solar modules sold in the European Union (EU) could be subject to lower value added tax (VAT) rates after an agreement was reached this week by finance ministers from across the bloc.
December 7, 2021
Tesla is being investigated by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) following a claim that the company did not appropriately inform its shareholders and the public about potential fire risks from its solar systems, according to a report by Reuters.
December 2, 2021
Enel Green Power has named Paolo Romanacci as the new head of its North America division, overseeing all renewables activities in the US and Canada.
December 1, 2021
Major US bank Wells Fargo has closed its maiden tax equity investment into a colocated solar-storage project currently under construction in New Mexico, US.
December 1, 2021
Tech major Amazon has added a further 2GW to its committed utility-scale solar PV capacity, adding projects in the US and Europe to its renewables portfolio.

Subscribe to Newsletter

Upcoming Events

Upcoming Webinars
December 21, 2021
Free Webinar
Solar Media Events
February 1, 2022
London, UK
Solar Media Events
February 23, 2022
London, UK
Solar Media Events
March 23, 2022
Austin, Texas, USA
Solar Media Events
March 29, 2022
Lisbon, Portugal

PV TECH POWER VOLUME 29 OUT NOW—Get 35% off your first year

Solar’s 2030 blueprint