Image credit: Ryan McKnight/Flickr
US renewable operators have been set back in their attempts to do away with new capacity market rules they see as discriminatory, with federal regulators dismissing calls for a rethink.
Earlier this week, sector representatives conveyed their “disappointment” after the US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) rejected their request for a rehearing of the minimum offer price rule (MOPR) changes, adopted by a FERC order in January.
Prior to FERC’s overhaul, capacity market auctions in the so-called PJM area – covering 13 states and the District of Columbia – applied price floors only to natural gas participants. FERC’s decision to extend the rule to all state-subsidised ventures, renewables included, had drawn industry criticism in January.
The FERC had justified the reform on the basis that the existing PJM tariff system was “unjust and unreasonable”, amid talk of state subsidies causing “price distortions”. Renewable operators had, in turn, described the MOPR changes as a move to “pad the profits” of fossil fuel players.
This week, following FERC’s rejection of their rehearing request, the various associations urged FERC to reconsider. In acting the way it has, said the SEIA’s VP for regulatory affairs Katherine Gensler, the FERC is “undermining PJM’s competitive market” and “standing in the way of states’ ability to choose low-cost clean energy.”
FERC’s decision this week did contain a silver lining for the renewable critics of the MOPR reform. As Gensler noted, the regulator has clarified that projects backed by voluntary renewable energy credits will not be seen as state-subsidised.
The row over the PJM overhaul is one of a series pitting FERC against green energy players. Over in New York State in late February 2020, a separate controversy flared up when FERC upheld the so-called buyer-side mitigation rules of the regional capacity market, also due to price floors renewable associations see as unjust.
The PJM policy setback is the latest witnessed by the US solar industry so far this year. The country’s rise to the top of COVID-19 case rankings has triggered mass layoffs and forecasts of muted growth, with campaigns to secure federal aid for the industry so far unsuccessful.
Jan 20, 2021 GMT
Virtually all PV modules for large-scale utility-based solar sites are imported to the US, especially from Chinese companies using manufacturing sites across Southeast Asia. This puts extreme pressure on US site developers, EPCs and investors, in understanding fully the differences between the companies offering imported PV modules How credible are the companies supplying the products? What is the financial health of the parent entity? Where is the module produced, and is this undertaken in-house or through third-party OEMs? What is the supply-chain for the module sub-components including wafers and cells? And then, how will the modules perform in the field, and is it possible to gauge reliability levels benchmarked against competitors? This webinar will provide insights from two of the leading experts in PV module manufacturing, supply, performance and reliability: Jenya Meydbray of PV Evolution Labs and Finlay Colville from PV-Tech. The 1-hour session will include presentations from Jenya and Finlay, and then a brand-new supplier scorecard matrix that combines the key outputs from PVEL's Module Reliability Scorecard and PV-Tech's PV ModuleTech Bankability Ratings, with specific focus on module supply and use in the US market.