PV module manufacturing metrology: measuring the making of solar modules

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email

Lamination is a key step in module manufacturing, and the quality control of the lamination process affects the degree of EVA cross-linking, which in turn affects module durability. Prior tests for EVA cross-linking were time-consuming and destructive. A new technology to measure EVA cross-link level in situ is now entering the market. The technology not only enables 100% lamination process quality control, but can also generate cross-link level maps or “fingerprints” with fine spatial resolution. These fingerprints seem to be unique to each lamination process. Thus, the lamination process can now be monitored and even tuned to an unprecedented degree, with precision and speed.

Module durability depends strongly on module design, materials and component selection. However, effective quality control (QC) during manufacturing makes a crucial difference in module durability, regardless of design and materials. Thus, in the race to reduce costs and maintain or improve module performance, QC metrology in module manufacturing is an important contributor.

While much effort is being made in using various imaging techniques (electroluminescence, IR thermography, photoluminescence, quantum efficiency mapping) to assess cell quality and interconnection in module assembly, less effort is made to develop tools to assess the quality of the encapsulation during manufacture including during lamination. In the lamination process, a stack consisting of front-glass, encapsulant layer, interconnected cell strings, second encapsulant layer and back-sheet are fused together under temperature and pressure. Among encapsulants, EVA remains the incumbent and is expected to remain so for many years (Figure 1).       

Figure 1: 2015 ITRPV prediction of market share for PV encapsulants.

During the lamination process, EVA cures to develop the required stiffness and adhesion. Insufficient cure can result in delamination, yellowing, and void formation. The standard EVA “fast-cure” formulation requires a lamination time of 12-15 minutes. Cost considerations seek a shorter lamination process cycle. Thus, the lamination process balances quality and speed.

Typically, the gel fraction test provides QC feedback for the EVA cure (cross-link) level. This test is based on extracting the soluble (non-cross-linked) fraction of a sample of the cured EVA. The “gel-fraction” is the weight fraction of material remaining after solvent extraction. The test has several drawbacks. It is manual, destructive, time-consuming (requiring 24 hours or more) and hazardous (solvents are toxic and flammable). Moreover, without a carefully developed and controlled test procedure, results can be highly variable. The net result is that manufacturers sample at a very low rate (one in several thousand modules) to assess EVA cross-link level. In short, the current QC method to assess EVA cure level in production is limited.

With these known drawbacks, the research community evaluated potential replacements. Many methods can measure EVA cross-linking, and a recent review lists 11. However, the review indicates that only one of these methods is likely to be used for in-line QC. A team in Austria (the Carinthian Tech Research and the Austrian Research Institute for Chemistry and Technology) is investigating the use of confocal Raman spectroscopy as a non-contact, non-destructive method. The Raman method relies on the change in the relative intensities of the –CH2- versus CH3 groups as a function of EVA cross-linking. Note that since Raman is an optical method, it can only be applied through the front-glass.

The Fraunhofer Center for Sustainable Energy CSE developed a simple method sensitive to the change in the time dependent (viscoelastic) response to deformation of the EVA as it cross-links. The test consists of indenting a probe into the back of the module and measuring the force as a function of time. The decay in the force depends strongly on the degree of cross-linking of the EVA underneath the back-sheet. Weakly cross-linked EVA has a steep force decay curve whereas strongly cross-linked EVA has a shallow one. The amount of force decay can be correlated with the gel fraction (Figure 2). Note that the response of the indentation method is sensitive over a wider range of lamination time than the Gel Fraction Test.

Figure 2: Top: Plot of gel fraction (%) as a function of lamination time. Bottom: Plot of the indentation test metric (LXM) as a function of lamination time. The indentation test is responsive to EVA cure level over a wider range of lamination times than the gel fraction test.

The indentation method is non-destructive, fast, repeatable and simple. The method was licensed from Fraunhofer CSE by LayTec GmbH and commercialised under the name XLINK. LayTec’s stand-alone lab unit (Figure 3) can be used to measure the cross-link level as a function of position thereby creating a map of the degree of cure (Figures 4-6). These maps have led to some unexpected insights in a set of commercial modules.

Figure 3: Off-line indentation tool that can be use to “map” the degree of EVA cross-linking as a function of position.

Figure 4 shows a localised region of low cure. Discussion with the module manufacturer identified the failure of a heating element in the laminator that occurred during this batch of modules. Such a failure would surely have been detected during routine maintenance, but how many incompletely laminated modules would have manufactured in the mean time?

Figure 4: Map of EVA cross-link level for a commercially produced module. The blue area of abnormally low cross-link level was found to be due to a failed heating element in the laminator.

Figure 5 shows an asymmetric curing profile in which the top right corner shows a lower level of cure and the lower left a higher level. This pattern is characteristic of a 2×2 module arrangement in a large production laminator. In this case, the centre region of the laminator cures the centre corners of the 2×2 array to a greater extent than the outer corners. To achieve a more uniform cure level it would be necessary to “tune” the laminator to deliver a more uniform heat distribution.

Figure 5: Map of EVA cross-link level for a commercially produced module. The distribution of cross-link level is indicative of a 2x2 module arrangement in a production-scale laminator.

As a final example, Figure 6 shows a symmetric cure distribution in which the center of the module has a higher cure level than the edges. This pattern is characteristic of a laminate that “bowed” during lamination. Bowing is the result of rapid heating in the centre resulting in a localised thermal expansion of the glass. The result is that the edges of the laminate bow upwards, reducing thermal contact at the edges and further increasing the non-uniform heating. Lift pins in the laminator have been introduced to provide for a more gradual initial heating, reducing the bowing phenomenon.

Figure 6: Map of EVA cross-link level for a commercially produced module. The distinctive cross-link distribution is likely due to “bowing” of the module during lamination.

In its on-line configuration (Figure 7) module manufacturers can now ensure that EVA meets the cure target for every module manufactured. Cure maps, measured off-line, can be used to evaluate the uniformity of cure and as feedback to tune laminator performance.

Figure 7: Meyer Burger incorporated an indentation measuring head into its laminator product line to enable on-line measurement of EVA cure level during production.

The best QC methods are fast, in-line, non-destructive, cheap and repeatable. With the introduction of LayTec’s XLINK, 100% monitoring of the lamination process is possible. In addition, the tool enables faster process development, faster assessment of new lots of EVA, and QC data for customers and certifiers. The off-line tool can be used to map the cross-link level, which enables adjustment or tuning of the laminator for optimum performance.

Industry interest in the technology is growing. Several major module manufacturers, including REC and Hanwha Q CELLs, are adopting the technology. As module manufacturers become familiar with the technology and the tool, a wide adoption is expected.

Although the basic design of solar modules remains unchanged appreciably in many years, a large number of innovations in cell and module design are simultaneously reducing cost, increasing efficiency, and reliability. Innovations in manufacturing metrology enable module quality, contributing to a reduced levelised cost of electricity via improved durability.

4 October 2022
Solar & Storage Finance USA, the only event that connects developers to capital and capital to solar and storage projects, will be back in November 2022.
11 October 2022
RE+ Florida returns in 2022. Solar & Energy Storage Florida is now RE+ Florida! This premier event for the Sunshine State will return October 11-12, 2022 in Miami.
11 October 2022
PV CellTech Extra will be held as a series of live webinars and on-demand sessions on 11-13 October 2022. We'll be taking a slightly further forward-looking view at the technologies and roadmaps for new cell architectures set to dominate mass production during 2023-2025 with special emphasis on the potential timelines for technologies beyond the single-junction cell design, including perovskite and hybrid concepts.
13 October 2022
The 2022 ACORE Grid Forum is a one-day event that convenes regulators, renewable, storage and transmission companies, and other leading grid experts in Washington, D.C. Speakers will examine the roles of administrative orders and actions, infrastructure policy, regional and state developments, and private sector strategies on the path to a carbon-free grid.
18 October 2022
The solar, storage and EV industries in the UK are going from strength to strength. There is no better place for the community to meet, share ideas and do business than Solar & Storage Live from 18-20 October at the NEC. There’s something for everyone; more than 150 exhibitors, a high-level conference, a start up and innovation zone, a poster zone, strategic partners to network with and much more. 
18 October 2022
The global PV market is entering a new era at unprecedented speed. The demand for high-power PV modules has soared, while interest in the future direction of solar technologies has intensified. Tongwei wants to create discussions between EPC companies, investors, and distributors, especially in Europe, which the company sees as a key growth market. Understanding the opinions and needs of clients in terms of shingled or N-type technology, as well as larger module size, is vital to Tongwei’s success in Europe and beyond. In this PV Tech TechTalk webinar, experts from TÜV NORD and Tongwei's CTO will discuss the risk analysis and reliability of the company’s shingled module technology and its applicability to different European markets.

Read Next

September 28, 2022
Queensland gets about 21% of its energy from renewables, but the state government has just set an increased target of 70% renewables by 2032.
September 27, 2022
Nearly a third of all renewable technologies employment came from the solar PV industry in 2021, according to a new report from the IRENA.
September 27, 2022
Greek developer Mytilineos has completed third-party engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) contracts on a backlog of solar PV projects in Chile, Uzbekistan and Spain.
PV Tech Premium
September 27, 2022
Europe must build out its own large-scale, vertically integrated solar PV manufacturing base as a means to ensure its clean energy transition.
September 27, 2022
Module manufacturer Boviet Solar has secured an 861MW supply agreement with US renewables developer Vesper Energy.
September 27, 2022
The European Technology and Innovation Platform for Photovoltaics (ETIP PV) has been relaunched to advise policymakers and promote the uptake of solar across Europe.

Subscribe to Newsletter

Upcoming Events

Solar Media Events
October 4, 2022
New York, USA
On-Demand Webinars, Solar Media Events
October 11, 2022
Virtual event
Upcoming Webinars
October 18, 2022
10am (EDT) / 4pm (CEST)