Tesla chief Elon Musk wins US$13bn court case over SolarCity acquisition

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
Plaintiffs had accused Musk of breaching fiduciary duties in pursuing the SolarCity deal. Image: Flickr/Heisenberg Media.

A judge has ruled in favour of Tesla chief executive Elon Musk, rejecting a case which claimed he unjustly enriched himself when the company acquired SolarCity in a US$2.6 billion deal in 2016.

Delaware Chancery Court judge Joseph Slights III ruled in favour of the defence in a ruling issued yesterday, concluding that there had been no breaches of fiduciary duty by Musk and that the acquisition was approved fairly.

This article requires Premium SubscriptionBasic (FREE) Subscription

Unlock unlimited access for 12 whole months of distinctive global analysis

Photovoltaics International is now included.

  • Regular insight and analysis of the industry’s biggest developments
  • In-depth interviews with the industry’s leading figures
  • Unlimited digital access to the PV Tech Power journal catalogue
  • Unlimited digital access to the Photovoltaics International journal catalogue
  • Access to more than 1,000 technical papers
  • Discounts on Solar Media’s portfolio of events, in-person and virtual

Or continue reading this article for free

Aggrieved shareholders had claimed that the decision to acquire solar installation business SolarCity, which was at the time led by Musk’s cousin Lyndon Rive, whose brother Peter co-founded the business, did not represent value for shareholders. They further alleged that Musk had breached fiduciary duties in pursuing the deal at a “patently unfair price” and for that reason, among others, sought damages of up to US$13 billion.

In his decision, Judge Slights said the process undertaken by Tesla in pursuing the acquisition was “far from perfect” and that Musk himself was more involved than a conflicted fiduciary should have been. Other conflicts at the board level were not “completely neutralised”, Slights added.

Nevertheless, the ruling also made clear that there had been “persuasive evidence” that the acquisition was fair given that minority shareholders had waved the move through.

“Indeed, the Acquisition marked a vital step forward for a company that had for years made clear to the market and its stockholders that it intended to expand from an electric car manufacturer to an alternative energy company,” Judge Slights’ ruling stated.

The full ruling can be read here.

Yesterday’s verdict follows Judge Slights’ previous ruling in October last year that dismissed direct claims against Tesla and brings to a conclusion a case that first arose back in September 2016, two months before the acquisition was concluded.

Read Next

July 20, 2023
Tesla’s Q2 2023 solar PV deployment decreased 38% year-on-year to 66MW as its battery storage system additions was met with a slight decrease from the previous quarter.
April 24, 2023
Its deployed solar was up from 48MW in Q1 2022, but solar deployments dropped sequentially in Q1 2023 mainly due to volatile weather.
March 31, 2023
Tesla’s Solar Roof technology has fallen short of the company’s deployment targets by some distance, according to a new report from energy analysts Wood Mackenzie.
January 26, 2023
Tesla navigated supply chain challenges to deploy 348MW of solar in 2022, the company’s highest install figure since 2017, when it added 523MW.
October 20, 2022
Tesla’s Q3 2022 solar PV deployment increased 13% year-on-year to 94MW as its battery storage system additions reached a quarterly high.
July 20, 2022
Tesla installed 106MW of solar PV in Q2 2022, its largest quarterly total for more than four years as the firm's energy division rebounded.

Subscribe to Newsletter

Upcoming Events

Solar Media Events
July 2, 2024
Athens, Greece
Solar Media Events
July 9, 2024
Sands Expo and Convention Centre, Singapore
Solar Media Events
September 24, 2024
Warsaw, Poland
Solar Media Events
September 24, 2024
Singapore, Asia