Canadian solar firms sue for exemption from Trump tariffs

February 12, 2018
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
Source: Canadian Solar.

Canadian solar manufacturers will suffer “immediate, severe, and irreversible injuries” as a result of the new US safeguard measures, according to a lawsuit they have filed against the Trump administration.

Silfab, Heliene, Canadian Solar and Canadian Solar Solutions are looking for an exemption from the Section 201 tariffs that will otherwise see exports of their cells and modules subject to 30% tariffs, falling 5% every 12 months.

This article requires Premium SubscriptionBasic (FREE) Subscription

Try Premium for just $1

  • Full premium access for the first month at only $1
  • Converts to an annual rate after 30 days unless cancelled
  • Cancel anytime during the trial period

Premium Benefits

  • Expert industry analysis and interviews
  • Digital access to PV Tech Power journal
  • Exclusive event discounts

Or get the full Premium subscription right away

Or continue reading this article for free

The US International Trade Commission (ITC) found that Canada had not been a major exporter of solar products but did not offer an exemption. When President Trump announced the measures, Suniva, one of the US firms that petitioned for the tariffs, said it was grateful to the president for “closing the threatened Canadian loophole”.

When anti-dumping measures were imposed on Chinese manufacturers by the EU and the US, the companies affected shifted some of their production to Malaysia, Taiwan, Thailand and others in order to sidestep the duties. There were fears that exempted nations could do the same.

A number of emerging economies have been exempted but can only export 300MW each and no more than 900MW combined in any given year. There was no suggestion from the ITC to exclude Canada and no explanation from the White House for the deviation from the recommendation.

Canada and the US are both parties to the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Under the terms of that trade deal, safeguard measures against fellow members are not permitted if they include a “quantitative restriction”.

In the court filing, the plaintiffs say they expect to sell a negligible volume of modules and cells into the US this year having “imported hundreds of megawatts of cells” in 2017.

They also claim that the low share of imports racked up by Canadian firms was not consequential. The NAFTA agreement lists this as a key consideration when members are looking to apply safeguard measures on one another.

South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, China and the EU have all filed complaints against the tariffs with the World Trade Organisation.

Read Next

March 23, 2026
The Ohio Power Siting Board (OPSB) has denied the development of a 94MW solar project following “substantial” opposition from local residents.
March 23, 2026
Terabase Energy has completed testing work at its Terafab version 2 solar module installation process, which is set for commercial shipments.
March 19, 2026
The California Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications Committee has unanimously voted 14-0 (and 3 abstentions) in favour of a bill for balcony solar.
March 19, 2026
US solar developer Avantus and Toyota Tsusho America (TAI) have completed construction at the 159MW Norton Solar Project in Texas.
March 19, 2026
There is “an emerging and significant compliance risk” for US solar manufacturers and buyers around the origin of solar wafers, according to new analysis from law firm Wiley Rein.
March 19, 2026
PV manufacturer Canadian Solar’s first US-made solar cells are expected to be produced by the end of March in Jeffersonville, Indiana.

Upcoming Events

Solar Media Events
March 24, 2026
Dallas, Texas
Solar Media Events
April 15, 2026
Milan, Italy
Solar Media Events
June 16, 2026
Napa, USA
Solar Media Events
October 13, 2026
San Francisco Bay Area, USA
Solar Media Events
November 3, 2026
Málaga, Spain