The latest Indian solar auction has seen wining tariffs return to extreme lows at INR 4.35/kWh (US$0.065) for 130MW of PV in the Indian state of Rajasthan.
The auction, held by the largest Indian utility NTPC, was for capacity outside solar parks and the three successful players were all Indian firms.
Unlock unlimited access for 12 whole months of distinctive global analysis
Photovoltaics International is now included.
- Regular insight and analysis of the industry’s biggest developments
- In-depth interviews with the industry’s leading figures
- Unlimited digital access to the PV Tech Power journal catalogue
- Unlimited digital access to the Photovoltaics International journal catalogue
- Access to more than 1,000 technical papers
- Discounts on Solar Media’s portfolio of events, in-person and virtual
Or continue reading this article for free
| Developer | Bid (INR/kWh) | Capacity (MW) |
|---|---|---|
| Shapoorji Pallonji | 4.35 | 50 |
| Mahindra Susten | 4.35 | 60 |
| Adani | 4.36 | 20 |
However, a total of 16 developers were all willing to put in bids below five rupees per unit. Tariffs below five rupees have divided industry commentators over the last six months as they speculated over just how bankable and viable such projects are. Nevertheless, the lowest ever solar bid in India from Finland’s Fortum Finnsurya Energy at a price of INR4.34/kWh was also in Rajasthan, although this was in a solar park.
Jasmeet Khurana, associate director, consulting, Bridge to India, told PV Tech: “This was an NTPC [auction] so it was expected that it would be aggressive.”
NTPC is seen as by far the most reliable Indian off-taker in a country where Distribution Companies (Discoms) are waylaid with debt. However, Khurana said the latest bids were still slightly lower than expected.
Recent India bids for Solar Energy Corporation of India (SECI) tenders have seen slightly higher tariffs due to SECI being seen as a less reliable off-taker than NTPC.
Referring to the new capacity being outside solar parks, Khurana said that there is a difference in terms of risk perception; meanwhile, in terms of cost, a solar park in Rajasthan might even be a little more expensive.
