Making new investments into grid infrastructure could be a method of reducing the impact of price cannibalisation on the European energy grid, according to speakers at Solar Media’s Solar Finance & Investment Europe event this afternoon.
Speakers at the panel, ‘How Will European Solar Respond to Power Price Cannibalisation?’, discussed how companies and investors can minimise the impacts of price cannibalisation, the phenomenon where an abundance of available renewable power supply exceeds demand, causing power prices to collapse, and undermining their own success. This is particularly threatening in the solar sector, where solar farms in an area all, by definition, produce more electricity at the same time, pushing this abundance higher.
Try Premium for just $1
- Full premium access for the first month at only $1
- Converts to an annual rate after 30 days unless cancelled
- Cancel anytime during the trial period
Premium Benefits
- Expert industry analysis and interviews
- Digital access to PV Tech Power journal
- Exclusive event discounts
Or get the full Premium subscription right away
Or continue reading this article for free
The Institute for Energy Research (IER) has published figures on the capture rate of European markets, a measure, as a percentage, of how much money a producer can make from selling electricity. The IER estimates that Germany, Europe’s top solar producer, recorded a capture rate of 94% in 2023, but warns that this could fall to 80% by 2026 and less than 50% by 2029.
“The solar capacity grows much faster than the system’s ability to take it in,” said Riku Merikoski, a senior power analyst at Axpo, and one of the panellists, who pointed to a lack of effective grid infrastructure as a key contributor to this phenomenon.
“I think this will get much worse, and I think some of us will get wiped out because of cannibalisation,” Merikoski added, suggesting that a lack of financial viability for the power generated by renewable projects could pose an existential threat to the solar sector. “I’m quite certain about that, and it’s a maturing of the industry.”
This latter point was echoed by several other panellists, who suggested that such a challenge is to be expected in a sector where the capacity for renewable power generation has increased much faster than the legacy grid and storage infrastructure needed to manage this power.
“It’s definitely something [where, in] long term, you’re a victim of your own success,” said Sulaiman Ilyas-Jarret of the UK Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, and another speaker. “In policy, we think about it in terms of the impact of our support schemes on price cannibalisation, and how we can improve the quality of our support schemes.”
“We’re trying to make the contracts for difference (CfD) more flexible and more dynamic, and not undermine the key benefit of the CfD, which is stability,” Ilyas-Jarret added, pointing to the success of government support schemes in the UK energy sector in particular, and how the government is aiming to continue this success, despite the risk of cannibalisation.
“It forces us, as an industry, to think about what we want to be,” said Jan-Phillip Kock, investment strategy manager for Encavis AG and another panellist, who suggested that the challenge of price cannibalisation has created an opportunity for the European power sector, which can now focus on issues of financial viability and balancing supply and demand, rather than simply expanding capacity for its own sake.
