AEMC rejects Australian industry call to reform marginal loss factor regime

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email
Ayer's Rock. Source:Flickr Shinazy Shinazy

The Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) has soundly rejected calls from the renewables industry to reform the marginal loss factor (MLF) regime, the controversial pricing system that calculates energy transmission and network losses for energy generators.

In a draft ruling published on Wednesday, the federal rule body for Australia’s energy markets said that it would maintain the MLF system on the grounds that the alternative would hike energy prices for consumers.

This article requires Premium SubscriptionBasic (FREE) Subscription

Unlock unlimited access for 12 whole months of distinctive global analysis

Photovoltaics International is now included.

  • Regular insight and analysis of the industry’s biggest developments
  • In-depth interviews with the industry’s leading figures
  • Unlimited digital access to the PV Tech Power journal catalogue
  • Unlimited digital access to the Photovoltaics International journal catalogue
  • Access to more than 1,000 technical papers
  • Discounts on Solar Media’s portfolio of events, in-person and virtual

Or continue reading this article for free

“While we recognise the need to bring down barriers to entry for renewables, moving from marginal to average loss factors would, in effect, cost consumers money,” AEMC chair john Piece Pierce said.

The body argues that the continued application of MLFs will help show new generators which locations are more profitable.

“Rather than penalising generators located in strong parts of the network, or consumers, the underlying challenge is to better coordinate investment in generation and transmission across the national electricity market so that financial incentives and are aligned with the physical needs of the system and everyone can benefit,” Pierce said.

Renewables investors and developers counter that the MLF system, whose rates are fixed annually by the market operator based on the prior year's annual average, makes investment riskier, given that it makes revenue volatile and increasingly difficult to forecast.

The rule change request was put forward by Indian mining giant Adani, who announced in early November that it was putting plans to invest a further $1 billion or more in Australian renewables on ice until the country’s transmission issues were addressed.

One investor group, representing AU$11 billion of investment in the market, is calling for the system to transition to an ‘average loss factor’ methodology. That system approximates the actual losses for new generation at sites where resource density is highest, instead of where the transmission system is strongest.

In a letter sent to the commission in September, the coalition said that some clean energy ventures have faced year-on-year MLF rating swings of over 20%, “materially impacting” revenues in ways the sponsors could not have foreseen.

The Clean Energy Investor Group, which counts 20 major investors including Macquarie Group, Innogy, Blackrock and Neoen, says lack of reform will cause private investment to leave the Australian renewables space, which they argue is crucial to bringing energy prices down for customers.

Clean Energy Council: System in "desperate need" of reform

Kane Thornton, CEO of the Clean Energy Council, slammed the AEMC’s decision in an interview with PV-Tech on Thursday, saying that it adds “risk, uncertainty and cost” for renewables developers and could prompt international firms to leave Australia.

“This is an example of market design that is no longer fit for purpose. It is yet another example of a market framework that creates a lot of risk and uncertainty for energy generators. In our view, the current regime is in desperate need of change or reform,” Thornton said. “There’s a range of options of how you might do that, and none of them is necessarily perfect. But we are obviously very disappointed that the market commission really ignored all that and decided to stick with the status quo.”

After years of momentum, investment in renewables Australia is sagging, according to a report published by the CEC in October. The group attributes this to a lack of federal renewables energy policy from next year and a tangle of transmission and connection issues that includes the MLF regime.

In its draft ruling, the AEMC said it will give the Australian Energy Market Operator more flexibility so it can “refine and improve” the way it calculates MLFs.

Submissions to the draft ruling are open until 16 January 2020.

Read Next

May 20, 2025
Octopus Australia has received grid connection approval from AEMO for a 300MW solar-plus-storage site in New South Wales.
May 20, 2025
Australia’s Victoria government has proposed seven REZ for the state, emphasising these will help achieve its target of 2.7GW of utility-scale solar PV generation by 2040.
May 19, 2025
Swedish solar developer OX2 has received development consent from the New South Wales government in Australia for a 90MW solar-plus-storage project.
May 19, 2025
New data released by Australia’s Clean Energy Regulator (CER) has noted that 553MW of capacity was approved in the NEM in April.
May 15, 2025
GCL Tech has received an environmental accreditation for a manufacturing facility, while Redsolar and CMEC-GL have announced new projects.
Premium
May 14, 2025
As the University of Queensland take the first steps towards commercialising a tin halide perovskite solar cell concept, George Heynes explores the development of the technology.

Subscribe to Newsletter

Upcoming Events

Solar Media Events
May 21, 2025
London, UK
Solar Media Events
June 17, 2025
Napa, USA
Solar Media Events
July 1, 2025
London, UK
Solar Media Events
July 1, 2025
London, UK
Solar Media Events
July 8, 2025
Asia